Policy analysis and reform recommendations grounded in evidence.
Model statutes, comparative state analysis, and white papers developed with legal scholars and policy analysts.
Bills under active tracking
Four pillars of proposed reform
Codified Verification Standards
Adoption of consistent evidentiary thresholds across family and civil jurisdictions.
Meaningful Consequences for Intentional Deception
Statutory frameworks that impose proportionate consequences for knowingly false claims.
Restitution for Documented Harm
Civil remedies for individuals demonstrably harmed by verified false allegations.
Judicial Training Programs
Continuing education for judges and magistrates on evaluating disputed allegations.
Comparative analysis of false-reporting statutes.
A quantitative and qualitative comparison of state-level statutes, including penalty structures, evidentiary thresholds, and civil remedies. Data is updated quarterly and reviewed by our policy research team.
Download Full AnalysisPublished research briefings
Evidentiary Thresholds in Contested Custody
Cost Analysis of Documented Wrongful Reports
International Comparative Frameworks
The Role of Independent Forensic Evaluation
Restitution Models for Documented Harm
Judicial Continuing Education Curricula
Government Resources
Direct links to federal and state-level public record archives, statutory databases, and legislative tracking services.
Future Legislative Goals
Our 2025–2028 legislative agenda prioritizes model statute adoption in five states and expanded judicial training programs nationally.